It’s Not About the News

Sep 20
2009

Newspapers are crashing and burning. I’m not talking about in their own medium — although there’s sad news on that front.  No, I mean in the social media world.  Why?  Because they refuse to modify their message to the medium. It’s an odd commentary for a medium built solidly in the communications world, but one thing newspaper publishers, editors and writers don’t understand is how to use a blog to their best advantage (not to mention Twitter and other social media).

Publishers. Publishers care about publishing. They want the funds to print another day.  Hence, they are concerned with revenue.  Guess what? Blogs are not great revenue producers — at least at first — and publishers are not patient people. They want the ads in today for tomorrow’s edition.  The result?  They are looking for posts that will bring in advertisers. They keep trying to develop content that the Advertising department can sell, rather than content the community wants to read or engage in.  It’s not a good model and it hasn’t worked.

Editors. Editors are a bit better, but also don’t understand the medium.  Great editors understand the need for personality and the public thirst for the news behind the news.  One of my favorite Sunday columns was a local editor’s post on how his reporters got the latest, greatest story — literally the story behind the news. However, the insights were saved for the precious Sunday paper and not posted on the paper’s website.

Another young editor at a different local paper, started a community blog. She inherently understood the need for community voice on the paper’s website, but didn’t understand that community in the blogging world means individuals not organizations.  She approached non-profits in the State with the opportunity to post on a blog set up for local causes. The result is a series of mini-press releases on golf outings and benefactor and grant news rather than insights into the causes.  I can guarantee you that the only people reading the blog are the marketing folks at other non-profits.  The real community isn’t interested.

Writers. Writers understand writing and followings, but newspaper writers are in competition with themselves. They are saving their stories for the paper, hoping to get in the Sunday edition. Their blog posts are bland and again, tend not to tell the story behind the story.  Why was it a difficult story to write?  How did they get a crying mother to admit her son had gone sour? How did they learn about the story in the first place?  Don’t just tell me you wrote a great story. Tell me why you felt it was worthy of the newspaper. Then, you might draw me to your story in the paper, but mostly, I’m not going to bother to read your current blog. It’s not giving me any insight into your craft.

Newspapers are built for blogging.  They just haven’t realized it yet, or approached it in the right way. I wish they would. I’m a news junkie at heart and would eat it up — as would a huge segment of the online world.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Facebook

Active Tense

Apr 13
2009

Marketing is a verb.  Seth Godin points it out in his book Tribes, but the fact is any dictionary will tell you the same thing.  The point is that, as a verb, marketing is about doing something. 

As with anything in life, action creates reaction.  It's a basic law of physics that also applies to51drpze7irL._SL160_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-dp,TopRight,12,-18_SH30_OU01_AA115_ marketing. Not all marketing gets the reaction you want.  Some seems to fall on totally deaf ears, but in reality, may be softening a final sale. It's what makes marketing maddening.  Sometimes you can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt what works, but you do know what doesn't.  Doing nothing doesn't work.  

The goal of marketing is to get your company into the customer's conversation zone.  If you're not talked about, considered, or part of the discussion, you're invisible.  That's not a good marketing strategy, and yet it's the summary of most marketing plans in the industry.  

In the days of yore (probably only 10 years ago), marketing was thought to be reserved for big companies with big budgets.  The world has changed, and some of the most effective marketing is not expensive, close to free, does take time and thought, and has flattened access to all companies big and small.  In fact, smaller companies may be able to do modern marketing better. 

"Big budgets may be more of a hindrance than a help for many package-goods brands coming up with ideas that resonate with consumers, " stated Unilever's Chief Marketing Officer Simon Clift at the Advertising Age Digital Conference.  As one of the largest companies in the world, Unilever still has a decent marketing budget, but Clift implied the healthy budget may make it too easy for Unilever's team to fall back on old ways rather than come up with innovative marketing ideas.  Necessity continues to be the mother of invention, and even if your budget is small to nonexistent it doesn't mean your marketing should be as well.  Rather, it means you need to be smarter about how you market, but market you must. 

Full disclosure: I used to work for a Unilever company.  It was a great experience, and probably gave me my first taste of the power and importance of marketing. If there's one thing consumer goods companies don't take for granted, it's marketing.  You shouldn't either.  B:B can learn much from B:C companies, not the least of which is the importance of being front of mind with a consumer, client or prospect long before the sale is made.  

Don't have time or the desire to do a marketing plan?  Just start by asking yourself one simple question: "What do you need to do be more top of mind with your ideal customer?"   Whatever the answer, that is your first marketing action step. Get started today. Remember action creates reaction, so just get moving, or as marketing genius company Nike would advise: "Just do it."

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Facebook

Moving Targets

Mar 30
2009

Segmentation ain't what it used to be, but then again what is?  Years ago, you could send out a mass message and let interested customers step forward all on their own. Then, customers started getting more discerning and couldn't be counted on to step up front and center, also known as the death of mass marketing.  To counter, marketing geniuses went into military mode — using a divide and conquer strategy, but calling it demographic segmentation.  They divided customers into all sorts of buckets including women, men, teens, mothers, fathers, lovers — you name it.  We consumers were beat for awhile, but then we started homogenizing and women became motor cycle riders as much as men became cooks.  You just couldn't trust stereotypes any more.  What was a good marketer to do?

Instead of leading the horse (ahem to consumer) to water, marketing folk learned how to gather the flock and find people who wanted to follow a particular brand, message, or affiliation. If this sounds obscure, think blogs, networks and user groups — places where people naturally gather to learn about something they self-decide they want or need.

Enter the recession, and along with the digital age marketing folk — in desperate need for low cost way, effective ways of reaching interested parties — know that segmentation is no longer just a science, but a full blown necessity.  Here's a quote I recently came across from the Jan. 1 2009 issue of CFO magazine:

"In a time of limited resources, management has a desperate need to figure out is priorities.  Now is the time to segment your customers."  Larry Selden, Professor emeritus, Columbia University and co-author of the book Angel Customers, Demon Customers.

Segmentation by any other name is really prioritization — who to choose to talk to, when, and about what.  And, in a time when resources are tight, it's more important than ever to use your resources wisely and not waste time, money or effort on non-viable prospects.

In printing, we are familiar with the concept of waste.  In marketing, reaching beyond your market base is also called waste. If ther were ever a time to get tough on waste of all sorts, it's now. In marketing, you attack waste with sharp shooter targeting.  It is, after all, a war out there.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Facebook

Silver Lessons

Mar 23
2009

What can you learn from a marketing campaign that misses the mark?  Plenty.

We invited two printing company CEOs who succeed at marketing to be part of an NAPL panel at the 2009 Top Management Conference in Tucson.  Both had won awards and we wanted them to share their knowledge and approach to marketing with the other attendees.  One of the panelists had won a total of four marketing awards — two gold and two silver.  I assumed he would discuss the gold awards.  Wrong.  He insisted he only wanted to discuss one of the silver awards and talk about why it didn't win a gold.

He started his discussion with "Let me tell you why this campaign didn't win a gold."  He went on to discuss how it was a great campaign, got the company entry into key decision makers at targeted companies, but didn't succeed largely due to timing (he was targeting retail just as the economy soured particularly for that sector).  But, he noted, the program worked on many levels and they are not abandoning it. Rather, they are fine tuning it in the coming year for other market segments.

Hazzah –  a CEO who realizes that marketing is not always perfect out of the gate and that we can all learn valuable lessons from failures as well as successes. Ironically, the panel followed a key note address by leadership guru David Ulrich in which Ulrich noted that all great leaders have experienced failure in their lives.  The distinguishing factor about a great leader is that he or she learns from the mistakes and goes on to even greater things. The famous example is always Abraham Lincoln, but I have a new hero — David Pitts, from Classic Graphics in North Carolina.  He's the guy on the panel who was determined to discuss lessons learned in missing the Gold.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Facebook

Beware of Innovation

Mar 06
2009

The word that is.  Recently I went on a printer's web site that claimed innovative service.  Well said, but was it believable?  Not if you looked at the rest of the web site surrounding the words. 

  • The copy had been written for a long shelf life and had not been updated in a few years or months. 
  • The pictures were pale (innovation would imply vibrancy to me), and the photos showed presses. Perhaps they were innovative presses, but from the customer's perspective, who can say?
  • There were no innovative aps — pages flipping, audio files, video.
  • There was no interactivity — not even one form to fill out, or "contact us" button — and those aren't really very interactive.

In short, the web site was nothing more than words on the screen, reflecting the printers penchant for putting words on paper, but little else.

So here's the question:  Who are you marketing to anyway?

If it's a potential customer (as one would hope), the word "innovative" has to reflect what it means in customers' minds and has to have some teeth behind it. Before you claim to be innovative, it would be nice to know exactly how the customer defines it, but you don't have any more time to wait. Start getting info from customers, but meanwhile — tomorrow — start updating your web site.  It's hard to claim "innovative" anything if you don't even have an innovative "skin", or web site.  It's a basic just like having a modern building with running water.  And, it doesn't have to cost you a small fortune.  Just like flat screen TVs, iPhones and all other technically wizardry, web programming and design has also become more affordable. Go get you some — technical wizardry that is.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Facebook

Interactive or Integrated Print?

Feb 27
2009

A news item from Cal Poly posted on WTT.com today states: "Cal Poly’s Graphic Communication Department is partnering with Goss International to revolutionize the printing industry by making it interactive."  The article goes on to discuss using print to provide codes that can be uploaded to mobile devices to create coupons and assist customers with obtaining special offers.  It's an "important step to ‘reinvent’ the value of print as a medium that expands reach and utility when combined with interactive technology such as handheld devices,” states the release.

That's good news, but begs the question: Hasn't print always been interactive? I would argue print's role hasn't changed, but the definition of "interactive" has.  Years ago, interactive meant a call to action in calling an 800 number and using a coupon code to get a special offer. Today, it means walking around with the coupon code in your mobile phone. Tomorow it may mean having the register scan your mobile phone for the coupon bar code and to do the debit transaction from your checking account.

And, in the end, isn't it all about marketing?  It's not a new concept that integrated marketing programs are the ones that work best. Integrated means using all medium at your disposal including (not excluding) print.  Every medium has its role in a well-thought out campaign.  The goal is to make sure that marketing people like me know where print fits and use it wisely and to their best advantage. Integrated in today's world just means "also interactive!" 

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Facebook

Getting Found

Feb 23
2009

Today I saw a banner ad on a web site that was borderline profound.  It said " Be Found Before They Start to Search," or something close to that. The message was simple.  The challenge is not about being found. It's about having customers who never look for anyone else but you.

Once customers start to search, the gig is up.  You're already a commodity.  One of many competitors who need to stand out to attract a customer. A better game plan is to be so solidly entrenched with a customer that he or she would never fathom to look around for anyone else. 

In the web 2.0 world, you constantly hearing about search optimization.  It's true that customers more and more use the web to find vendors, but it's also true that great partners, vendors and suppliers are not a commodity and are not searched for as if the customer were looking for a local plumber or lawn care service.  Once they are looking for you on Google, you have been relegated to lawn service status. 

Bottom line:  Graphic arts and printing companies are more special than that.  Let's be found long before a customer starts searching.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Facebook

Thoughtful Leaders

Feb 15
2009

There's been much discussion lately about Charles Darwin, born February 12, 1809, as last week marked what would have been his 200th birthday.  A new book out called Angels and Ages, notes that on that same day, a world apart, Abraham Lincoln was also born. Both men became leaders of their age although in very different fields, and both are still discussed, studied and admired for their thought leadership. 

According to Buckminster Fuller (remember I promised to write more about him in the January post), one attribute of a leader is the ability to anticipate the future.  Similar to Darwin and Lincoln, Fuller was considered ahead of his time.  He saw a future so far out that the rest of us couldn't quite visualize it.  One thing that Fuller, Lincoln and Darwin did in common was to take time (lots of it) to think. For example, Darwin formulated his theories during his famous voyage of the Beagle in 1836. He published notes from that journey in 1838, but his landmark work Origin of Species was not published until 1859, 21 years later!  

In today's world, we all feel time starved.  One of the handicaps for business leaders today is the lack of time to make purposeful and thoughtful decisions. The world is almost moving too fast. Or, is it? Is it possible that we just haven't taken the time to create a strategy, philosophy, or vision about where we want to take our companies? Or, that we've gotten old and tired?

A January 31 Harvard Business Review blog post by leadership author Stewart Friedman discusses the qualities of leadership and he compares great leaders to great musicians. "Leadership is a performing art," he writes. "You can can never be too good at it."  He goes on to explain:

"Great performers devote themselves to increasing their capacity to perform.  It's the same with leaders. The best ones commit to learning continually because they want to make a difference."

In our current youth culture, Stewart Friedman makes a great case for admiring how we can improve with age, especially in terms of leadership.  It's also a good time to go back through the ages and look at our great leaders, many like LIncoln and Darwin, who did not hit their strides until their later years. 
If you're feeling this crisis needs the young, stop and take a deep breath. What it really needs is leadership, thoughtful leadership and experienced leadership.  

It's no coincidence that this year's theme for the upcoming NAPL Top Management Conference is Leadership. As always, it's timely and on target.  I hope you can participate. Another thing I hope you actively participate in is this blog/newsletter.  Please let me know if you feel the topics are on target, feel free to comment on a post, and if you'd like to contribute as an author, I'd welcome a broader voice of thoughts and perspective. Either just write something up you'd like me to post on your behalf, let me know if you'd like to be a more formal guest author, or e-mail me with topics you'd like to see covered. 

~ Rhona Bronson

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Facebook